Crime: Multi-agency Public Protection Arrangements

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department (Gerry Sutcliffe) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I have great pleasure in announcing the publication of the fifth annual MAPPA reports today. Multi-agency public protection arrangements, or MAPPA, are now well established across England and Wales and making an increasing contribution to protecting the public, preventing re-victimisation, and reducing reoffending.
	The arrangements focus upon those violent and sexual offenders who are assessed as presenting the greatest risk of harm and whose safe management requires a high level of inter-agency co-operation. They are led locally by the probation, police and prison services working together with other agencies who contribute to the management of these individuals, including social care, health, housing and education services.
	This year has seen significant challenges to those operating MAPPA, in the form of general and specific case reviews that have underlined significant progress made through MAPPA, but have also highlighted certain areas for improvement. It must be remembered that effective management of high-risk offenders, as a discipline, is still relatively in its infancy. There is continuous development and the standards and good practice of tomorrow, achieved through experience and research, are likely to be different from today's. The challenge therefore is not only to match current practice with what we know, but to respond rapidly to new learning.
	The individual agencies have responded with major national initiatives to improve the assessment and management of MAPPA offenders and these, together with local actions, are reflected in the MAPPA business plans which appear with the annual reports for the first time this year.
	The offences committed by those offenders qualifying for management within MAPPA make an enormous impact, principally upon the victims but also upon the wider public consciousness. They raise questions about how the risks presented by such offenders are assessed and then how it is possible to manage those risks once the offender returns to the community. While we can never eliminate risk entirely, we are all entitled to expect that everything that can be done is being done to prevent these offenders reoffending.
	Even among those qualifying for MAPPA, the majority are managed within ordinary agency arrangements. While no incidence of further offending can ever be acceptable, it is a tribute to the effectiveness of the arrangements that very few of those who require active MAPPA management are charged with a further serious offence while so managed. I commend these annual reports because they detail the work that goes on day in, day out, in cases which generally do not make the headlines, because of the skill and commitment of the agencies involved in protecting the public, including the key work to prevent offending against previous victims.
	Copies of every area report are being placed in the Library of the House.

Criminal Cases Review Commission

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department (Gerry Sutcliffe) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I would like to inform the House that Mr James England, Mr Ewen Smith and Ms Julie Goulding have been appointed as commissioners of the Criminal Cases Review Commission. Copies of the press release relating to these appointments are available in the House Library.

EU: General Affairs and External Relations Council

Lord Triesman: My right honourable friend the Minister for Europe (Geoff Hoon) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	My right honourable friend the Foreign Secretary (Margaret Beckett), Sir John Grant (UK permanent representative to the EU) and I represented the UK at the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) in Luxembourg. My right honourable friend the Minister for Trade, Investment and Foreign Affairs (Ian McCartney) and my honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for International Development (Gareth Thomas) represented the UK for Trade and Development Ministers' discussions.
	The agenda items covered were as follows:
	Trade Ministers
	Ministers discussed progress on the Doha Development Agenda and regional trade agreements with Commissioner Mandelson over dinner.
	Development and Trade Ministers
	Doha Development Agenda: Commissioners Mandelson and Michel briefed Ministers on the latest state of play, emphasising this remained a top priority. It was important to move forward on achieving the development aspects of the agenda.
	Economic partnership agreements: Commissioner Mandelson briefed Ministers on developments in trying to conclude economic partnership agreements with African, Caribbean and Pacific countries.
	Aid for Trade: The council adopted conclusions which re-emphasised the commitment made in 2005 for €2 billion a year to be made available for Aid for Trade by 2010, unconnected to progress in the WTO Doha development round. The initiative aims to build the capacity of developing countries to take advantage of trade opportunities that result from changes in trade rules and globalisation.
	Development Ministers
	Governance issues in development policy: The council adopted conclusions on governance. Over lunch Ministers discussed how the EU could ensure a coherent approach to governance and efforts to address corruption.
	The effectiveness of development aid: The council adopted conclusions setting out the guiding principles for two aspects of aid effectiveness—complementarity and division of labour. In discussion, council welcomed the push to improve complementarity and division of labour, and emphasised the importance of both volumes and quality of aid. Germany said it would continue work on complementarity and division of labour in its presidency.
	AOB: Reform of the UN development system. Mr Thomas drew partners' attention to the forthcoming report on UN reform by Kofi Annan's high-level panel and pressed for continuing EU ministerial attention to UN development reforms. The presidency said it intended to offer recommendations to the December council, based on the report's findings.
	Migration and development: Over dinner Ministers discussed migration, agreeing that it was a key issue and that brain drain was a major concern for development. An important way to address this was to improve conditions in originating countries through development assistance.
	Development and Foreign Ministers
	Policy coherence for development: The council adopted conclusions on integrating development concerns into council decision-making. In discussion, Ministers agreed that further work was needed to improve policy coherence for development in order to help achieve the UN's millennium development goals, particularly in light of the EU's broader objective to strengthen its external policies. Germany said it would continue work on this area during its presidency.
	The EU strategy for Africa: The council agreed to move forward with the EU strategy for Africa, welcoming the progress report by High Representative Solana and Commissioner Michel. The Commission asked member states to report on national actions to help to deliver the strategy. Ministers agreed to review implementation at the GAERC and European Council in December.
	Foreign Ministers
	Enlargement: Council conclusions welcomed the Commission's report on Bulgaria and Romania, noting it supported EU entry for both countries on1 January 2007.
	Sudan/Darfur: Ministers noted the still deteriorating situation in Darfur and committed to continuing to provide support to the African Union mission in Sudan. Commissioner Michel reported on his visit to Sudan with the Commission president and their meetings with President Bashir. The Foreign Secretary briefed partners on the visit by my right honourable friend the Secretary of State for International Development (Mr Hilary Benn) on 16 October: the situation was critical and we had to maintain political pressure on Khartoum for transition to a UN force together with international partners. Ministers agreed conclusions setting out council concerns and welcoming consultations between the AU and the Sudanese Government on transition to a UN mission.
	Zimbabwe: Ministers exchanged views on the deteriorating situation and agreed on the need for continued engagement with African partners to promote reform in Zimbabwe.
	Middle East: The council adopted conclusions on the Middle East peace process, calling for an end to violence and restraint on both sides. It offered its support to President Abbas in his attempts to form a Government based on the quartet principles, and highlighted the need for progress on movement and access to improve the situation of ordinary Palestinians. It welcomed the expansion of the temporary international mechanism, which would provide support to an even greater number of vulnerable Palestinians. The Commission noted the importance of strengthening capacity within Palestinian institutions.
	On Lebanon, council conclusions welcomed the deployment of Lebanese armed forces and UNIFIL to the south, and noted the almost complete withdrawal of Israeli troops, calling on Israel to complete withdrawal as soon as possible. It offered its support to the Lebanese Government in asserting their authority across Lebanon and in taking forward political, social, economic and security reform.
	Western Balkans: On Bosnia-Herzegovina, council conclusions welcomed elections and looked forward to the formation of new Governments, emphasising also the need for progress on the reforms necessary to conclude negotiations for a stabilisation and association agreement.
	On Serbia, conclusions welcomed the holding of the second EU-Serbia troika and expressed willingness to move forward with stabilisation and association agreement negotiations once Serbia achieved full co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
	On Kosovo, Ministers agreed on the need to support UN Special Envoy Marti Ahtisaari's work. Conclusions called on the parties to work closely with Special Envoy Ahtisaari and welcomed preparatory work on a European security and defence policy mission to Kosovo.
	Iran: High Representative Solana briefed partners over lunch. Conclusions expressed deep concern that Iran has not yet suspended its uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing activities as required by the International Atomic Energy Agency board and UN Security Council, and confirmed EU support for consultations on a new Security Council resolution imposing measures under Article 41 of the UN charter.
	Georgia/Russian Federation relations: Ministers discussed the recent escalation of tensions between Georgia and Russia, and agreed conclusions expressing grave concern at the measures adopted by Russia and calling for restraint from both sides. The council also reaffirmed the EU's willingness to work with both sides to facilitate mutual confidence-building and contribute to a peaceful resolution of the crisis.
	North Korea: Ministers discussed North Korea over lunch and agreed conclusions condemning the test, committing the EU to fully implementing the provisions of all relevant UNSC resolutions, notably 1718 and 1695, and urging North Korea to return to the six-party talks, to comply with its NPT obligations and sign and ratify the comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty.
	EU-Ukraine relations: Poland raised relations with Ukraine under AOB, including in the context of the European neighbourhood policy. The EU-Ukraine summit will be held in Helsinki on 27 October.

EU: Lahti Summit

Baroness Amos: My right honourable friend the Prime Minister (Tony Blair) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	The informal meeting of EU Heads of State or Government on 20 October followed up the 2005 Hampton Court summit in addressing a range of issues that are central to the question of how Europe responds to the challenge of globalisation.
	There was a constructive discussion of the EU's external energy relations, particularly our relationship with Russia. There was unity on the need to build a close and legally binding partnership based on mutual, long-term benefits based on the principles defined in the Energy charter treaty and the declaration agreed at the G8 summit in St Petersburg in July this year. These principles include market-based rules, market opening, and transparency and reliability across the whole of the energy relationship. The EU will shortly start negotiations with Russia on a new comprehensive agreement to replace the10 year-old partnership and co-operation agreement. It was agreed that these principles should form the core of any new agreement.
	We shall also continue to develop our relations with other producer and transit countries around the EU, and we agreed on the need to extend the internal energy market principles of open, transparent markets to our neighbourhood.
	It was also agreed that the EU must show strong leadership in combating climate change. The Prime Minister of the Netherlands and my right honourable friend the Prime Minister (Mr Blair) wrote to their colleagues about this ahead of the meeting. A copy has been placed in the Library of the House. They stressed the need to act now to avoid catastrophic consequences in the future. President Barroso, both in the discussion and with the media after the meeting, emphasised the Commission's intention to act on the climate change agenda, and highlighted the Commission's energy efficiency proposals as the first stage in this.
	Migration was also discussed. Illegal immigration is an issue that concerns the whole EU. We agreed on the importance of well functioning border controls and gave our full support to the European Border Management Agency. It was stressed that co-operation with Africa and other countries of origin and transit is essential.
	My right honourable friend the Prime Minister raised the desperate situation in Sudan. The conflict has led to 2 million displaced persons. He emphasised, to general agreement, the need to keep up the pressure from the EU on the Sudanese Government to cease military action, allow UN peacekeepers into the country, and reopen talks with non-signatories to the Darfur peace agreement.
	Finally, innovation policy was discussed—how best to develop it as a source of European growth. The Commission's intention to prepare a comprehensive strategy on intellectual property rights in 2007 was welcomed. Enhancing the co-operation between the private and public sectors is also essential. European technology platforms and joint technology initiatives were cited as excellent examples of public/private partnerships. A proposal to create a European institute of technology was also discussed, and looked forward to further consideration in the Council.
	The presidency invited President Putin to join the EU Heads of State or Government for dinner. Energy was one of the main topics. The presidency reiterated the conclusions that we had reached earlier. For his part, President Putin stated his conviction that energy co-operation should be based on principles of predictability of the energy markets and the mutual dependence of suppliers and consumers.
	The EU and President Putin agreed to enhance our co-operation on international matters such as Iran, North Korea and the Middle East peace process.
	The EU also emphasised the need for a full investigation of the murder of Anna Politkovskaya, and for those responsible to be brought to justice.
	The EU expressed its concerns at the increased tension between Georgia and the Russian Federation.

EU: Structural Funds

Lord Sainsbury of Turville: My right honourable friend the Minister of State for Industry and the Regions (Margaret Hodge) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	In his Statement to Parliament of 28 February 2006, my predecessor, Alun Michael, launched a consultation on future structural funds spending in the UK. The consultation invited comments on three issues: the draft national strategic reference framework for future UK structural funds programmes; the Government's approach to distributing the UK's structural funds allocations under the new competitiveness objective; and administrative arrangements for delivering the funds during the next budgetary cycle.
	I am today publishing the Government's response to the consultation exercise and the UK's national strategic reference framework for structural funds programmes during the 2007-13 period and these will be placed in the Library of the House. These documents set out the strategy for future structural funds spending across the UK, the allocations of funding for future programmes, and the administrative arrangements for delivering the programmes.
	Under the new EU regulations for the structural funds, each member state must draw up a national strategic reference framework establishing its broad priorities for future structural funds spending. The DTI has developed the UK's national framework in close collaboration with other government departments responsible for the structural funds, the Scottish Executive, the Welsh Assembly Government, the Northern Ireland Administration and the Government of Gibraltar. The strategy establishes three high-level priorities for future programmes: enterprise and innovation, skills and employment, and environmental and community sustainability.
	The national framework also makes a firm commitment to use the structural funds to support ethnic minorities. It requires all programmes to take account of the needs of ethnic minorities when determining priorities and in the development of individual projects. In particular, they should take account of the difficulties that certain ethnic minorities face in accessing the labour market and the low levels of employment, skills and entrepreneurship suffered by certain ethnic-minority groups.
	As explained in the response to the consultation, the Government have decided that the UK's mainstream competitiveness funding should be divided equally between the European regional development fund (for regional development) and the European Social Fund (for promoting employment) at the UK level. As phasing-in competitiveness regions, South Yorkshire and Merseyside are a special case. The Government have therefore decided to allocate 60 per cent of the phasing-in competitiveness funds for South Yorkshire and Merseyside to the ERDF and 40 per cent to the ESF.
	The Government have decided to allocate ERDF competitiveness funding between the UK's competitiveness regions by reference to population, GVA and levels of innovation, enterprise and skills. The Government have also applied a cap and safety net to limit the change in each region's proportion of funding in comparison with 2000-06. This will protect regions from particularly heavy reductions in their proportion of funding.
	The Government have decided to allocate ESF competitiveness funding between the UK's competitiveness regions by reference to numbers of workless people, numbers of working-age people with no qualifications, and numbers of working-age people with low qualifications. Again, we have applied a cap and safety net to limit the change in each region's proportion of funding in comparison with 2000-06.
	The UK will face a 50 per cent reduction in total structural funds allocations for 2007-13 in comparison with the current period, reflecting our strong economic performance and the need to focus funding on the poorer new member states. This means that most regions will, inevitably, suffer a significant reduction in funding. However, the Government's approach will ensure that funding is allocated fairly between the UK's competitiveness regions on the basis of objective evidence of economic need. It will also ensure that the allocation of funding supports our domestic priorities for regional development and employment.
	England will receive a total of €4.2 billion1 or€91 per capita in competitiveness funding. Within England, the funds will be focused on the six underperforming regions, which will receive €121 per capita on average, or 73 per cent of England's share of the funds. The richer English regions will receive lower allocations, reflecting their stronger economic position, but allowing them to tackle pockets of deprivation. For example, the three regions of the greater south-east will receive on average €54 per capita. Cornwall will also receive €579 million of convergence funding, agreed at the EU level.
	Scotland will receive a total of €573 million or €122 per capita in competitiveness funding for 2007-13. It will also receive €157 million in phasing-out convergence funding for the Highlands and Islands. Wales will receive a total of €121 million or €114 per capita in competitiveness funding for 2007-13. It will also receive €1.8 billion in convergence funding for west Wales and the valleys. Northern Ireland will receive a total of €419 million or €248 per capita in competitiveness funding for 2007-13.
	The new arrangements for distributing competitiveness funding are a radical departure from the approach used in 2000-06. We now have the opportunity to put in place an objective methodology based on sound economic criteria. The change to a new system inevitably modifies each region's proportion of the funds in comparison with the current period. However, the use of a cap and safety net limits the change in each region's proportion of receipts, ensuring that no region faces a much steeper cliff-edge than others, and facilitating the transition from higher levels of funding in the current period.
	The response to the consultation explains in more detail the Government's methodologies for allocating the funding. The indicative allocations for each of the UK's competitiveness programmes are set out in an annexe to the national framework. The European Commission must agree the allocations under the new structural funds regulations.
	Finally, the response to the consultation and the national framework set out the broad arrangements for delivering the funds in the 2007-13 period. In England, the RDAs will take a leading role in delivering regional ERDF programmes, working in partnership with local stakeholders. Meanwhile, the regional skills partnerships will play an active role in setting strategies for ESF spending in the English regions within the context of a national English ESF programme. In this way, the two funds, while separate, can be more easily aligned to meet defined local and regional needs.
	1 All allocations are in 2004 prices and are total allocations for the 2007-13 period. These allocations will be uprated in due course to current prices for each year of the 2007-13 programming period.

NATO

Lord Triesman: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Margaret Beckett) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	The honourable Member for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (Michael Moore) has replaced the right honourable and learned Member for North East Fife (Sir Menzies Campbell) as a member of the United Kingdom delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly.

NHS

Lord Warner: My honourable friend the Minister of State (Andy Burnham) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	Today, we have placed in the Library copies of a publication from the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement called Better Care, Better Value Indicators.
	In June 2006, the NHS institute published the Delivery Quality and Value document, which showed how improving NHS productivity could deliver better patient care and resources for the NHS. The indicators present the performance of acute hospital trusts and primary care trusts against specific indicators in April to June 2006. The institute will publish these data on a quarterly basis.

Pensions

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: My honourable friend the Minister of State for Pensions Reform (James Purnell) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	In the 2002 Pensions Green Paper, Simplicity, Security and Choice: working and saving for retirement, the Government announced their intention to introduce a web-based retirement planner. The service, targeted at those people on low to medium incomes who do not readily have access to financial advice, was intended to inform planning and saving for retirement. The first element of the service, the provision of online state pension forecasts, was delivered, on schedule, in 2004. The remaining elements of the service were due for delivery in 2006.
	Earlier this year, the Government proposed fundamental reforms in our White Paper, Security in Retirement, to both the state and private pension systems. In the light of these proposals and their inevitable impact on future pension provision, we carried out a detailed evaluation of whether the planner, as developed, could provide people with accurate information during this period of reform. The evaluation determined that delivering accurate online information about state pensions would become increasingly difficult given the uncertainty about the exact shape of future pension provision. This would also add considerable further cost and complexity. We have therefore decided to suspend further development of the web-based planner.
	We remain committed to the principle of providing people with information to support retirement planning but are clear that this now needs to be set in the context of the wider White Paper developments.

Refugees

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department (Joan Ryan) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	The Home Office published a consultation document on 23 October to seek views on its proposals for an overhaul of the way in which government-funded refugee integration services are delivered. The proposals centre on the establishment of a core set of services to be made available to refugees across England (it will be for the devolved Administrations to decide on the case for analogous changes for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland). The proposals move considerably beyond those set out in the current national integration strategy, Integration Matters, and the Government will issue a revised policy statement on the future of refugee integration services as an outcome of the consultation process. The Government have invited comments on their proposals by Christmas, and a copy of the consultation paper has been placed in the Libraries.
	Along with the changes in their refugee integration strategy, the Government will reform the arrangements for regular consultation on matters affecting refugees as an integral part of their wider approach to stakeholder management in the Immigration and Nationality Directorate. The National Refugee Integration Forum will therefore be wound up, although arrangements will be made to continue project work undertaken under its auspices. The Government wish to place on record their gratitude to those who have served on the forum since its inception in 2000.